Saturday, December 14, 2013

The Key is the Container - Ruminations on a Creative Approach to Re-Contextualizing Sacred Mushrooms

     As pertains to the qualitative differences between cubensis and the more traditional strains of Psilocybe, in Huautla de Jimenez cubensis is the only mushroom referred to exclusively by it's Spanish--versus Mazatec, name 'San Isidro'; cubensis came with the Spanish and their cattle, and is widely considered the least desirable of the species. The patron saint of labor, farming and livestock, San Isidro is emblematic of the invaders and livestock-culture. Contrary to Wasson's suggestion that the term 'derrumbe' is exclusive to Ps. caerulescens, I heard the term derrumbe applied to both Ps. caerulescens and Ps. zapotecorum. From what I gathered, the 'derrumbe' mushrooms were largely considered the most coveted and desirable, owing to their fuerza/force. Ps. zapotecorum seemed generally to be the most coveted species; they are very strong, quite vivid in the visions, my initial impression was that of friendliness, but they are very serious and powerful. The clearest vision that stands out from my initial experience with the zapotecorum was of seeing highly detailed psychocosmic roses pouring off the altar; it was quite striking, vivid and beautiful. It's a mexican and indigenous mushroom through and through. I think some of the difference is apparent in the respective terminologies for los derrumbes and los pajaritos; the mexicana has more of an ethereal character that seems to evoke interstellar and deep-space vistas. My first time eating the 'chicon nindo' variety of Ps. mexicana--which I brought back from Mexico with me, when I closed my eyes I saw the outline of a cosmic horizon cast in subtle blues. It appeared to be some manner of astral star-city with a new Jerusalem theme, the streets were quiet and there was an aura of deep calm about the scenario. The zapotecorum--by contrast, was more chthonic and perhaps iconically 'shamanic.'

     There are reasonably solid and good strains of cubensis, people seem to develop a preference for this or that strain grown in this or that way. I spontaneously and unwittingly became partial to strains of cubensis that were mostly sourced from the Amazon; after sourcing my preferred cubensis genetics, I realized I had a predilection for Amazonian strains. I suppose on a certain level cubensis is a 'universal' mushroom, and convenient. Once basic adjustments are made to technique, Ps. mexicana is just about as easy to grow though it can take a bit more in the way of patience. They require more air-flow while maintaining high humidity, and seem to benefit greatly from supplemental blue LED light in the ~452nm wavelength range. The blue-LED light has been observed to stabilize and normalize their development and morphology in the fruiting-phase. The onset and quality of the experience with mexicana is somehow more 'classical' to what I consider to be the psilocybin-state. One of the major differences is in onset, where cubensis can elicit an uncomfortable rush of patterned and somewhat forceful-viral-alienesque visions, mexicana elicits more of a spacious, calm and welcoming openness. I have uniformly experienced mexicana to be calm, spacious, open, relaxed and deep where cubensis can become unusually dark or forceful. Between the two, I'm definitely settled on mexicana in so far as providing a positive and beneficial experience. I have alot of the younger generation asking questions about the optimal approach to psilocybin mushrooms. In terms of providing guidance and direction to others, I have what I feel is an ethical responsibility to guide people towards mexicana, which I have consistently found does in fact provide a more beneficient, calm and peaceful experience more conducive to the sorts of mystical experience observed in the griffiths study.

     In the hopes of putting the final nail into the coffin of this 'elf/fairey' issue, from W.B. Yeats 'The Stolen Child,'

Come away, O human child!
To the waters and the wild
With a faery, hand in hand,
For the world's more full of weeping than you can understand.

     I think it important to keep in mind that 'the fairey faith' is a folk-tradition with it's own history, folklore, art and imagery. People seem to get caught up in the imagery and treat it on either anachronistic terms, or view it outside the endemic contexts out of which it arises. This perspective of the fairey-faith--as Wasson observed, is embedded into the very linguistic structure of the Mazatec conceptualization of the mushroom. In preparation for ingestion, I observed shamans lovingly whispering to mushrooms in their hand, using the characteristic reverential diminutive, nti si tho 'the little ones who spring forth,' pequeño niño 'the little children,' pequeño habitantes que vive en el bosques, 'the little inhabitants of the forest.' This linguistic use of reverential diminutive--in reference to the mushroom/elf phenomenon, encompasses a Mazatecan attitude towards mushrooms that is quite beautiful and aesthetic; I also believe this cosmology has a broad history down through time. Much of my own impetus to study these indigenous visionary-plant folk traditions, was in the observation that the bulk of people are very irresponsible and disrespectful in how they approach psychedelics and sacred plants. And while I certainly agree that there CAN be a contextualization effect, I am hesitant to sacrifice the folk traditions, linguistics, arts of native peoples on the bloody altar of patristic-scientistic-fundamentalism simply because the idea of 'elves/fairies' is an uncomfortable one to the scientific paradigm. The time for witch-burnings is over, and I think science has better use than in burning folk-ideologies at the stake. So it is very interesting, I personally feel there is an immense amount of very honest potential in science--I'm versed/studied in science as part of my work, but perhaps it will require a more original and primordial approach to psychospirituality before that depth potential in science is realized.

     At times I may be a bit too candid and honest about my own personal experience. Taking a step back from it all, I can see how my story would really come as a bit of a shock. I certainly don't take my particular story so seriously as it may appear, I occasionally reach out to common-minded individuals for feedback on what has been a powerfully transformative life-course. That said, I neither take myself nor these experience as hard-fact; some of the imagery I'm using is basically just playing with imaginative processes on the visionary-archetypal level. The emphasis I place is on the transparency of the theophanic imagination; none of this is concrete or certain, as in that moment we gravitate towards fundamentalism. 

     
The 'contextualization' effect per psychedelics is worthy of comment. I became enamoured with the works of Pablo Amaringo at age 14, and some of it's gravitas may well have been in this 'democratization of epiphany,' that ephiphany and vision was freely available without priestly mediation. When people approach me for guidance per psychedelics--which is happening ALOT these days, I'm quick to point out 'I have no interest in being a teacher, I'm not a shaman,  at best I'm a friend with experience who is here to help.' This considered, I have definitely noticed that the visionary content of ayahuasca-experiences seems to span a much broader array of 'themes' than I have encountered in sacred mushrooms. Keep in mind that I am specifically talking about the visionary content, and I feel there is more to psychedelics than simply the visions/hallucinations. My first experience drinking ayahuasca in the Amazon was very centered on snake-type visions, other experiences had distinct dragon or UFO imagery. So when I look at Amaringo's art, while it has a marvelous variety of themes and contexts, on a certain level I very clearly recognize that the art is ayahuasca-themed. That is to say, I'm not entirely sure the broader context of of Amaringo's art faithfully represents the millieu of sacred mushrooms. By comparison, it can be argued that the art of the Huichole is unusually cogent across artists; different artists display a marked cogency of themes within the yarn-art medium. Does this then suggest that peyote-visions look like Huichole art paintings? Can this be extrapolated to other plant-psychedelics? I don't think so ... 

     
My broader suggestion here is that while yes, psychedelics inculcate and evolve a cross-contextual democratization of epiphany, I'm not sure it's good to view it as a 'free-for-all' on absolutely relative terms. I have personally observed many-many people who simply incorporate psychedelics into their psychopathology. In fact, one of the things I very often mention to people is that our culture lacks a necessary-context for using sacred plants in a meaningful way. In my case, I studied the NAC-peyote religion, ayahuasca in the jungle, and mushrooms with the Mazatec, because I felt it necessary and prudent to create a vehicle for deepening and strengthening myself in regards to these plants.

Friday, December 13, 2013

Psyche Logos - On the Depth Principle

I'm reading from the 'Uniform Editions' of James Hillman, which are currently being published by Spring publications, and are thematically arranged from Hillman's major lectures, writings, scholarly essays, clinical papers and interviews. I'm working on the second volume 'City and Soul,' but read a couple more of his works recently including 'Suicide and the Soul,' and 'The Dream and the Underworld.' The recent Hillman biography by Dick Russell is really superb and contextualizes his work wonderfully, though it is quite a substantial read at over 700 pages. It can take some time to develop perspective on precisely what Hillman was doing in his particular approach to psychology, and his style and approach can be somewhat grating. By his own admission, his approach to psychology was largely one of critique, and particularly critique of science and scientific psychology. This critical approach to scientific psychology is not only peculiar to Hillman's own personality, but was largely the result of time he spent interning at psychiatric facilities. His first book 'Suicide and the Soul' puts forth the thesis that biomedical psychiatry and scientific psychology make certain blanket assumptions that wholly ignore the psyche-itself, and so devalue and dehumanize clients at the clinical level. Some of the suggestion is that psychiatry isn't really psychology per se. Hillman's philosophy of psychology is largely pre-Socratic and Greek in origin, particularly derived from the writings of Heraclitus. Hillman very much embodies both archetype of the puer (eternal youth), as well as the figure of the Socratic gadfly; his critique of scientific psychology is so direct, blunt and clear that it has traditionally been pretty threatening to scientific psychology. 

The primary nub of contention is in Hillman's assertion--in line with the the Greeks, that the psyche-itself is not a concrete-ancillary phenomenon, but a formless dimension of transparency and depth. His work demonstrates again and again that when the psyche-itself is viewed on these depth terms in the form of dream, creativity, mythologem, art etc., the hard-fast-tidy findings of scientific psychology are often reduced to absurd curioso. I think his work highlights a situation in contemporary psychology that is analogous to a situation in psychology that existed in the late 50s. By the late 50s, the scope of psychology had become primarily limited to the behavioral paradigm of B.F. Skinner, who argued that complex behaviors such as language were entirely reduced to classical and operant conditioning. So grunts and cries were subtly re-inforced until they became the complex languages of adulthood. In Noam Chomsky's 1959 critique of Skinnner's book 'Verbal Behavior,' he demonstrated that the complexity of language necessitated an a priori conditioning factor or template for language in the human nervous system, thus was born the field of 'cognitive psychology' which re-claimed the domains of cognition and thought for psychology as a whole. I believe Hillman's work re-claims another vital domain for the field of psychology. 

Interestingly enough, the very Greeks upon which Hillman's 'Archetypal Psychology' is based, are ALSO the very same Greeks who laid the ontological, epistemological and metaphysical foundations for the scientific method. So it is very interesting, I personally feel there is an immense amount of very honest potential in science, but perhaps it will require a more original and primordial approach to psychology before that depth potential in science is realized.

Tuesday, November 19, 2013

Go Quietly Amid the Noise and Haste - Sacred Mushrooms and the Art of Silence

Maria Sabina was born and died in poverty. In Alvaro Estrada's seminal 'The Life and Chants of Maria Sabina,' Sabina recounts eating the mushroom to fill her stomach and stave off the hungers of poverty. As shamanism comes into vogue, every hipster under the sun--including yours truly, has a blog or a podcast selling psychedelic-illumination--neatly packaged and well-marketed--for a low-low price! Buy now while the deal lasts!

And yet Maria Sabina--widely regarded as one of the most unique voices to emerge from the sacred plant-traditions of meso-America--a true expert in sacred plants, never even owned a pair of shoes. Yet in spite of her poverty, she rarely--if ever, refused to provide a mushroom vigil to someone who had asked. She never asked money for her services, and certainly never advertised.

The truest experts in the use of sacred plants are not the ones making noise, marketing their wares, and garnering attention; the true experts in sacred plants are dwelling quietly in silence, living out their lives according to their means and within the vessel of their calling. So let us remember in the midst of all the noise, that the true depth of this art of the sacred plant tradition rests in stillness and silence.

Sunday, November 17, 2013

 The Golden Thread - Sacred Mushrooms and the Sufi Connection (a rough sketch)

Since returning from Huautla de Jimenez four years ago, I've more or less remained silent on various aspects of the deeper strata of what I experienced in connection with the ancient Mazatec tradition. While I tend to be somewhat intellectual and verbally expressive, it has been remarkable to observe that in reflecting on the deepest strata of the mushroom tradition—the khirqa-akbariyya or baraka of the mushroom—my soul becomes wrapped in a most exquisite silence. The subtlety and transparency of the sacred tradition of the mushroom is virtually impossible to express, and in my extensive study and practice of nearly all of the major contemplative-mystical spiritual traditions of the world—from Buddhism to gnosticism, alchemy, and mystical Christianity—I have really only ever found that one spiritual tradition ever comes close to verbalizing the deepest potential of the sacred mushroom: this is the Ishraqi or Illuminationist school of Sufism as espoused by teachers such as Suhrwardi and Ibn arabi. Things only slowly began to coalesce in my mind after a decade studying the mushroom directly through ingestion, through mushroom cultivation, in pouring over the available ethnographic and ethnomycological literature, and extensively studying the literature of Sufism, the entire Collected Works of Jung, the Diwan al' Shams-i-Tabrizi of J'allaludin Rumi, the Sophianic Diwan and Tarjnumann-al-Ashwaq of Ibn' arabi and the collected works of Henry Corbin and Peter Kingsley; only after a decade or more did the connections between the primordial tradition of the Greeks as transmitted to Sufism, and the ancient tradition of the sacred mushroom--as it came from Siberia with the Athapascan migration--began to elucidate itself in my perception. Not to spoil the story before I even tell it, but the connection between the Pre-Socratic Greeks, the Sufis and the mushrooms of the Mazatec is a group of people native to Siberia who were called the Avars. It is a little known fact that this nomadic band of Mongol Siberians effectively created the meta-ontological substratum upon which our scientific-technological-democratic civilization was formed. But, that's another story all together: as the legend goes, the very father of philosophy himself—Pythagoras--was gifted a golden arrow by the Avar-Hyperborean Abaris, who came with this gift as a shaman of his people. While scholars have been at odds with this story and the apparent evidence for over 2500 years, a much deeper story is being told in this legend of the golden arrow of Abaris: in Pythagorean circles, this sort of symbolic teaching-story would be called symbola or acusmata and reserved exclusively for initiates of the tradition. And let's be frank, sacred mushrooms aren't about having fun, or entertainment: the evidence speaks clearly, before monotheism and technocratacy, before this world we inhabit—with it's notions of time and matter--was even created, there was the primordial tradition of the mushroom. This was/is an initiatic tradition going at least 50,000 years back into proto-history, a tradition of revealed knowledge/gnosis in the paradigm of Ishraqi/Illuminationism: a living theophany of the heart.

As many of us know, Amanita muscaria is still widely used as an entheogen by the Uralic-speaking peoples of western Siberia and more relevantly the Paleosiberian-speaking peoples of Far East Russia. These are the descendants of the very Avar-people who brought philosophy-herself—as an ancient shamanic-ecstatic artform—to the ancient Greek-Fathers. The eastern Siberian Koryak tell a story about how the fly agaric (wapaq) allowed Big Raven to carry a whale across the sea and to it's home. The spittle of the god Vahiyinin (Existence) becomes the wapaq-fly agaric and acts as a food for Big Raven, who tells the little mushrooms to grow forever on the earth so that his children—the people—could continue to learn from the little mushrooms. While this story may seem like arcane indigenous rhetoric, I believe it to be a parable for the transmission of the ancient mushroom-tradition across the Bering straight and into the new world. The Ojibwa ethnobotanist Keewaydinoquay Peschel reported to Gordon Wasson the use of the fly agaric mushroom amongst her people, where it is known as miskwedo. The story of the northerwestern tribal connection to the sacred mushroom tradition is an ethnolinguistic story waiting to be told. Amazingly enough, the Inuit tell a very similar story about a whale, a raven and a mushroom. The Inuit story slightly differs in describing a connection between the sacred mushroom—which is unnamed—and moonlight: the mushrooms grow in a particular field where the moonlight falls at a particular angle.

Confabulating this seemingly impossible—and utterly unlikely—nubulae of connections, the sacred mushroom tradition of the Mazatec was revealed to the Western world on the coat-tails of a very synchronous set of coincidences that drew Gordon Wasson out to Huautla de Jimenez on that fateful June 29th night in 1955. Ironically, we can credit none other than the Sufi-popularizer Idries Shah for initiating the series of coincidences that ultimately led Gordon Wasson by the hand to the sacred mushroom tradition and the Mazatec altar. In Shah's 'The Sufis,' he comments on Sufi language-play,

“The Arabic word for a hallucinogenic fungus is from the root GHRB. Words derived from the GHRB root indicate a knowledge of the strange influence of hallucinogenic fungi.”

Shah then goes on,

“The usage of these words, though not incorrect, are so unusual that there is absolutely no doubt that a message is being conveyed to the effect that chemical hallucinogens derived from fungi provide and undeniable but counterfeit experience.”

Now, Shah was something of an interesting character. While Shah has largely been credited for popularizing Sufi teachings in the West, serious questions as to the authenticity of Shah's teachings on Sufism have been raised in James Moore's article “Neo-Sufism: the Case of Idries Shah.' As Yannis Toussulis argues in his book on Malamtiyya Sufism, Shah made several liberal departures from classical Sufism. Toussulis also documents Shah's penchant for chicanery in his associations with students of Gurdjieff including John G. Bennett. All things considered, Shah is often viewed as something of a pilferer of the original Sufi-tradition. So it seems unlikely to me that Shah—while clever, would have been able to credibly determine the role of hallucinogenic mushrooms in the history of Sufism. He makes a clear connection, but in the image of the mushroom only sees a reflection of his own 'counterfeit experience' and chicanery. In fact, the connection between ancient Sufism and the mushroom goes back much further than Shah was aware: it ultimately goes back to the ancient-Mystery schools of the pre-Socratic Greeks.

Enter Greek classicist and mythological scholar Robert Graves. Graves extensive interactions with Idris Shah are a matter of record, as he in fact wrote the introduction to Shah's seminal work 'The Sufis.' In Graves essay 'The Two Births of Dionysus,' he explicitly mentions,

'Wasson began his career as a journalist without any university education (which may account for the preservation of his genius), became a Wall Street reporter, was taken over by JP Morgan and Co. as their press agent, and soon elevated to Vice-President when his extraordinary understanding of business became apparent. Similarly with his second profession: he began as an amateur mycologist and has since become the acknowledged founder of the huge, immensely important new science, ethnomycology. Whenever I pick up strange news of mushrooms, as often happens, I send it to him for filing. It had been a chance bit of information that I passed on to him in the early fifties that prompted him to investigate the mushroom oracles of Mexico.'

So it seems likely that Graves passed on chance information from Shah to Wasson, and this is no new argument. As Terence Mckenna put it, Wasson was 'acting on a hint dropped to an Irish poety by a great-grandson of Mohammed (Shah).'

But what truly interests me is some of the similarity between the esoteric Sufi doctrine of the Great Teacher-Philosopher Ibn 'arabi, and the revelation of the mushroom. My journey into the center of the visionary potential of the human nervous system, out of the mundane world of the war-bloated American consciousness, began and ended with a mushroom. I was in high school when I first ate the sacred mushroom. I had developed a particular interest in the inspired musings of Baudelaire, Rimbaud, and the nineteenth-century French hashish eaters. I mulled over Baudelaire’s Flowers of Evil, and fancied myself precocious, except for the fact that I wasn’t a particularly popular young man. In the Flowers of Evil, I intuited the first and faint stirrings of an authentic complexio oppisitorum, ripe with mystery and the irrational vicissitudes of the heart. As an Irish-American, I lusted after things strange: the stranger the better. In Baudelaire’s vision of the “artificial paradise,” my youthful fancy found wings and took flight. I would sit beneath the trees and imagine I was the sole denizen of a moon-bound garden rife with Baudelaire’s flowers of evil. The centerpiece of this perfumed flower garden overflowed, as if some sort of alien and opulescent fountain, spilling out into four causeways from the crux point. Unbeknownst to me at the time, the word for psychedelic sacrament in the Nahuatl language of the ancient Aztecs translates to mean “flower.”

The mushroom became the centerpiece of my imaginal Eden in the years that followed. One day while perusing books in the library, I came across the image of an Indian woman holding mushrooms out over smoke in her outstretched hands, eyes half-closed in prayerful reflection. The image took on a life of its own in my imagination, and that life was larger than my own. Since that time, I have identified the image as one taken from Gordon Wasson’s The Wondrous Mushroom, but to this day the image in my mind’s eye remains much larger than the one from Allan Richardson’s photograph. For not only does everything appear expanded, but there is a light escaping off the top and convex lenticular surface of the saprophytic basidiocarp like stardust off a fish’s back. Several years later, the very same Lumen Naturae shown cleary through the illustrations and photography that accompany the Oss/Oeric Psilocybin: Magic Mushroom Grower’s Guide. The image captured my attention in one resolute gesture of mystery that has guided my soul ever since.


In a cosmic adumbration of what psychedelic and literary pioneer Aldous Huxley termed “gratuitous grace,” later that very same day I happened to be walking into the boys’ locker room when a friend of mine ran into me and, reaching into his overcoat pocket, handed me a bag full of the very same genus of mushroom I had earlier seen as an image in the student library: Psilocybe. Over the years, the manifestation of the mushroom in my life as a guiding Imagos of the sacred has been uniformly accompanied by what analytic psychologist Carl Jung termed synchronicity. Synchronicity, an acausal principle of connection between disparate spatial and temporal events, finds its most apt mythological expression in the Greek figure Eros: winged god of Ecstasy and the spontaneous product of the fusion of Chaos and Gaia. Like the “flowers of evil” image which equates the delicate beauty of a flower with diabolical daemonia, two forces in seeming and impossible opposition to one another are brought into a state of inexorable fusion, what alchemists refer as the Coniunctionis. From this fusion erupts an irrational and transcendent Other which brings the entire system into a supraconscious state. Synchronicity is the temporal sensing of this supraconscious Other, and has been observed to be prescient of the revelation of Spirit in its incarnation as supraconscious Other: for me, this Other came in the form of a mushroom.

During my first experience before the Mazatec altar in Huautla de Jimenez, a very particular thing happened. Before I had traveled to Mexico, I had a dream in which I was told that I would meet the Theotokos (God-bearer) in the mountains of Mexico. Wasson's account of his own velada in Huautla was prescient of my experience when he recounts,

'As I said before, I had been seated in the corner of the room on the left of the altar, a vantage point from which I could observe everything that was happening. Through Cayeteno, Sabina asked me to move because the Word would come down there. Twenty years later, in telling the story of her life to Alvaro Estrada, Sabina explained her conception of 'the Word:' in a notable passage she says:

… I see the Word fall, come down from above, as though they were little luminous objects falling from heaven. The Word falls on the Holy Table, on my body: with my hand I catch them, Word by Word.'

It's almost impossible to talk about what happened in a way that others can understand. But that night of my first velada before the Mazatec altar, a light descended from the effigy of the Virgin Mother upon the altar and hit my heart. When it hit my heart, I immediately fell to the ground as if a lightning bolt had hit me. And while I was 32 at the time—and had seen the Allan Richardson photograph at age 14—I realized that the in the time-scale of the tradition I had been brought into as an adoptee--the ancient-primordial tradition of the sacred mushroom, that on this time-scale only a split-instant had passed. As I sank deeply into the ground, I had a vision of the psychospiritual structure of human experience upon planet earth as an infinitely thin membrane upon which the activities of coming/going, birth/death, being/non-being were viewed. In the ancient Greek-mystery tradition of Pythagoras, they call this the initiation into anamnesis, a word which means 'remembering.' Of note is that the central practice of sufism--the dhikr, translates to mean 'remembrance' whereby the devotees heart remains perfectly absorbed in the Names. In Pythagorean circles, anamnesis has particular connections to the doctrine of re-incarnation, and as demonstrated in Peter Kingsley's seminal 'A Story Waiting to Pierce You' is invariably linked to the Tulku tradition of Tibetan Buddhism. Of particular note here is that the Tulku-Lamaist tradition of Tibet is certainly derived from an ancient shamanic practice of the previously discussed Avars. The basic experience is one of connection to a particular spiritual tradition over multiple lifetimes, because you directly recognize that there is no life/death per se; these are simply surface phenomenon etched upon a supra-ordinate Spirit-strucuture. As such, when we connect with such an ancient-primordial tradition as the sacred mushroom, we are quite literally connecting with a spiritual phenomenon that is at least hundreds of thousands if not millions of years old: our little old life is suddenly not so important in the light of this. I realized right there in front of the Mazatec altar that while 18 years—nearly two decades--had passed in my little life, it was only the blink of an eye to the very tradition which I had been transmitted in that moment.

Several years later, I discovered an intiatic language for describing this phenomenon in a very particular doctrine of the Great Sufi Teacher Ibn arabi: the doctrines of mystic kathenotheism and successive theophany in the recurrence of creation,

'the gnostic's heart 'is colored' in every instand by the color, that is, the modality of the Form in which the Divine Being is epiphanized to him. (hint, there's a reason my nick is 'azure'). He then resembles a pure 'spiritual matter' informed by the faiths, or a mirror receiveing the forms and colors reflected in it, but expanding and contracting to their measure. And he reveals his heart to the Divine Being in the same form which the Divine Being has chosen to disclose Himself to him.'

Eternity-herself is a single-flickering instant when this theophanic image—in my case a mushroom, is truly revealed. Suddenly a much broader perspectve opens up. In my earliest experience with the Spirit which animates the mushroom, I remember very clearly being shown the face of the mushroom. It appeared in the form of several interpenetrating concentric spheres. As the spheres coalesced, they would excrete higher-dimensional beings in the form of elves. I was asking the mushroom several questions about my personal life: my father-relationship, why I had so much trouble getting through college courses in spite of the fact that I rarely scored below a 98% on even the most challenging science exams. The mushroom looked at me quite plainly and said, 'you have been given a deep gift by me and I could care less about your little, petty personal issues.' It seemed quite cruel at the time, but years later I began to really understand what the mushroom was doing. To this effect, Ibn arabi very specifically ruminates:

'Creation as the 'rule of being' is the pre-eternal and continuous movement by which being is manifested at every instant in a new cloak. The Creative Being is the pre-eternal and post-eternal essence or substance which is manifested at every instant in the innumerable forms of beings; when He hides in one, He manifests Himself in another. Created Being is the manifested, diversified, successive, and evanescent forms, which have their substance not in fictitious autonomy but in the Being that is manifested in them and by them. Thus creation signifies nothing less than the Manifestation (zahir) of the hidden (batin) Divine Being in the forms of beings: first in their eternal hexeity, then—by virtue of a renewal, a recurrence that has been going on from moment to moment since pre-eternity—in their sensuous forms. This is the 'new creation' to which, according to the theosophists, the following Koran verse alludes: 'Were we wearied by the first creation? Yet they are uncertain about a new creation.'

What we're sitting on with the mushroom is—in many ways, more powerful than nuclear fusion: it is a tradition that has seen the creation and destruction of many of the major world civilizations. I just wanted to give some sense tonight of a deeper dimension of possibility with this stuff, and what a lot of my life's work has been about. Thanks for listening!

Saturday, November 16, 2013

Sacred Mushrooms - Putting The Civility Back Into Civil Liberties

'The connection to The Friend ...
is secret,
and very fragile:
The Image of that Friendship,
is in how you love.'

For certain individuals, psychedelics seem only to indulge their sheer and temperamental deviance. Whether Charles Mason or Gordon Todd Skinner, the appeal seems to strictly lie in the social marginalization of psychedelic-phenomenon. It is not so much the content or the depth of the experience that is the area of focus, but the sheer eccentricity in pursuing something forbidden; it is not the vision so much as the taboo. As such, psychedelic culture often finds itself on uneven ground, a social millieu in which sociopathy, narcissism and pathological splitting dominate group dynamics. Too often in my experience have I observed the participation mystique of a group under the influence of psychedelic-drugs to eclipse each and every individuals own common sense and basic civility. It is as if--under the pretense of a shared participation in a marginal phenomenon, basic civility and conscionable concern take a back seat to simply acting weird ...

Yet in the Mazatec tradition, the mushroom very much occurs within the context of the most basic forms of civil grace. In fact, Gordon Wasson's very first velada was performed by Maria Sabina as a civil grace to the mayor at the time--Cayetano Garcia, an individual whom Sabina felt socially indebted to. The mushroom itself is afforded a special seat at the table, and treated as an honored guest. The poetry of the Aztec codices laud the mushrooms ability to strengthen bonds of friendship.

In my estimation, the Mazatec use of reverential diminutive in referring to the little precious ones, los santos ninos, los diocitos, is to place the subtle nuances of daily behavior into the forefront of human and humane perception. Not least amongst these precious little things, are the daily observations of basic human civility in greeting and treating each and every precious little other with nominal courtesy and respect. The way of the sacred mushroom is to ingratiate ourselves to one another on the levels of kindness and compassion. Outside of this basic level of civility, respect and compassion, what use are these psychedelics?

The civil liberty in psychedelicized epiphany and heirophany is not in simply doing anything and everything we would like, but in evolving enough disciplined courtesy and respect to honor the light shining through our most subtle interactions with this world. These are the 'precious little ones,' the luminous elves, the spirit in nature, that shines through the psychedelic cosmology. Without this basic sense of civil courtesy and respect, these might as well just be common drugs for the rats.

Thursday, November 14, 2013

Beyond Science - Mushrooms As a Pan-Ideological Folk Tradition

Recent research confirms what we've known all along: psilocybin can occasion both mystical experience and increases in the personality domain of openness. And while we celebrate and welcome the return of the prodigal son that is science to the fray of psychedelia, much remains unexplained about the mystery that is the sacred mushroom. Curiously absent from the current dialogue in science, the roles of cosmology, technique and tradition as represented by the Mazatec approach to mushroom divination remains largely unrecognized and certainly misunderstood. Adding to the confusion, ad hominem mis-representations of both the works of Gordon Wasson and the Mazatec tradition--as typified by Maria Sabina, proliferate in the shock-jockey tabloid-stylings of Andy Letcher and Jan Irvin. And while scientific field-research continues in the exploration of the traditional uses of ayahuasca in the Amazon, no such contemporary research has looked with any depth at the Mazatec tradition. Why has it taken so long for the mushroom to re-emerge as a capstone of psychedelic research, and what special challenges does the mushroom pose in terms of the method of science?

In consideration of these question, it is interesting to note that the very first preliminary bio-medial research into psilocybin--since the late-60s FDA/DEA moratorium, was NOT particularly successful. Rick Strassman's account in the latter part of 'DMT: The Spirit Molecule,' details a rather harrowing psilocybin session in which researchers completely lost control of the session and so prematurely ended the study. Subsequent research into the use of psilocybin for the treatment of OCD left something to be desired. Not until the recent Griffiths studies at Johns Hopkins has anything of real moment emerged as to the potential value of psilocybin. In what ways did the Griffiths study facilitate the emergence of this value-potential in psilocybin, a value those of us who have systematically used psilocybin as part of a disciplined spiritual practice naturally understand?

Of relevance to this question and discussion, it is worth noting that while both ayahuasca and peyote have both readily lent themselves to institutionalized forms of religion in UDV/Santo Daime and NAC traditions respectively, this pattern of institutionalization is curiously absent when it comes to the mushroom tradition. To the Mazatec, the mushroom is not something to be discussed at church, but something intimately shared in small-private circles of family and friends. Under this consideration, perhaps the mushroom poses a special challenge--above and beyond those of peyote/ayahuasca, in being treated by the institutionalized settings of both religion and academic research.

This taken into account, let us first and foremost treat the mushroom for what it is within the context of it's own endemic setting: a folk tradition, craft and artform. The question is not, 'what can we do with this mushroom,' the question is: what is this mushroom unto-itself? I believe the real insight of the Griffiths study was not in the suggestion that psilocybin occasions mystical experience--which is obvious to anyone who has explored psilocybin thoroughly, but in recognizing the pre-eminence of ethics in so far as the well-being and health of the patient is concerned. The Griffiths study was not a bio-medical study strictly speaking, but a clinical view into the natural beneficence of  mysticism in a research setting. As such, I believe the orientation of the researchers allowed deeper information about the mushroom to emerge.

But let us treat the mushroom for what it truly is: a folk tradition, an artform and a personal heirophany. Let us return the mushroom to it's root in the soul, and study it from the very place of it's origin.


Wednesday, November 13, 2013

The Inscrutability of Elves, Fairies and the Archetypal Sub-stratum of Psychedelic Experience

The Mazatec make oblique reference to the elf-phenomenon in the many names they ascribe to the mushroom. In Spanish--from the Mazatec, pequeño niño or 'little child,' in the Mayan language 'aluxes,' which is the equivalent of the spanish 'duende,' elf or the quality of spiritedness. I routinely heard people refer to the mountain above Huautla de Jimenez as the 'duende,' I actually lived right on the duende/Chicon during the majority of my stay in Huautla. One night I woke up in a state of sleep paralysis to the site of ~4ft tall elf figure in the bed next to me, white hair and a sombrero and a very old/still face. I interpret it to be a sort of local and colloquial expression of the 'green man,' al-khidr or 'spirit guide' phenomenon.  I collected spores and specimens of Ps. zapotecorum, Ps. caerulescens and Ps. mexicana on that mountain side; I am particularly fond of los pajaritos, the little birds/Ps. mexicana. I myself have had several encounters with these elven-entities under the influence of mushrooms, I don't wholly know what to make of it. It makes me think of a dream I once had. In the dream, I am at the abandoned pueblo/anasazi cliff-dwelling site at mesa verde in Southern Colorado. I enter one of the caves and there is a dark-skinned Indian man--very regal and beautiful, who tells me he is the 'Spirit of the Mushroom.' He has a small leather pouch full of jewels. He opens the bag and throws the jewels on the ground, and pointing to the jewels asks me, 'how can The One also be The Many?' It's an old-Greek question really, a philosophical question--but somehow I place this elf-phenomenon within the context of this question: how can The One also be The Many? I feel this phenomenon may be the expressive arm of the mushroom as an organized and aware intelligence. Evans-Wentz's 'The Fairey Faith in Celtic Countries' is an interesting read on the history of this topic 

So far as the archetypal experiences are concerned--and this looming question of elves/fairies etc., one of the things I've always tended to notice is that the animating presence within the mushroom (which the Mazatec are frank to discuss), when pressed to really provide proof of it's existence, has a tendency to present itself in such a way as to simultaneously cast itself into question. It's a lot like reading Joyce's 'Ulysses,' there is an almost theatrical and humorous simulacrum of the sacred and profane. I think the fallacy to avoid is making of this phenomenon a paper mephistopheles or straw-man; that is, it seems imprudent to either drink the kool-aid or toss the baby out with the bathwater. In terms of the archetypal aspect of this phenomenon, at the foundation of Jung's epistemology of the archetypes is what he called 'empirical objectivism,' or the 'reality of the psyche.' So the very foundation of Jung's particular formulation of the archetypes was to say the contents of the psyche viz a  viz active imagination has an empirical grounding in reality. Ironically enough, Jung also specifically refered to the archetypes as 'the litttle people' of the psyche. The problem I see in equivocating this phenomenon of the 'little people' with the straw-man of cult-sensibilities, is that in order to do so one must-necessarily and simultaneously reject the very empirical objectivism upon which the notion of the archetypes is based. I would have to say that the contents of psychedelic-vision are necessarily deluded-hallucination, the psychedelic cosmologies of the Celts and Mazatec are so much hogwash. That said, I'm somewhat hesitant to toss out the Heraclitean Aion, the archetype of the divine child, the diocitos or precious little ones of the Sierra Mazateca, with the pejorative bathwater of unconscious projection.

This in mind, the trap of 'spiritual materialism' ala Chogyam Trungpa is best avoided. I maintain a good sense of humor in this regard, but there's a lesson to be had in this invocation. I see spiritual materialism along a spectrum, on the one side you have hyper-material spiritualism, which is a fetishistic investure of material things with spiritual significance: crystals, food, and objects. I notice hyper-material spiritual when people seem convinced we can eat our way to enlightenment, so long as we eat the right thing or generate enough orgone-energy ala willhelm reich etc. I also feel many of the teachings on the 'energy body,' and 'chakra system' succumb to this trap of hyper-material spiritualism. On the other end of the spectrum is hyper-spiritual materialism which rests on the metaphysical assumptions of rational-materialism, the morbid fantasy that nature is a lifeless object.